[ad_1]
had been a few of the strongest bonded frames ever made. I labored in a Trek store, and by no means noticed a damaged one, even 15 years after they give up making them (for price causes, not as a result of they had been failing.)
Aluminum’s status for a harsh trip is, I believe, attributable to two elements:
1) The bike trade’s insistence that body flex “wastes power”. It would not, however that is what they settled on, advertising and marketing sensible, and the development was to make frames that had been simply too stiff. Couple that with the (additionally incorrect) that skinny tires are extra environment friendly, and you have got a recipe for a nasty trip.
2) That is extra of an opinion, however I believe that there’s a resonance issue at work with large-diameter aluminum frames… they ring like a bell, and that stings the arms. It is just like the sensation of a four-cylinder bike. They really vibrate lower than a twin or triple, however there’s one thing in regards to the nature of the vibrations that the human hand would not like. It isn’t geometry… my “3.8 Collection” Cannondale touring bike is a nasty beast with skinny tires, and it is not a brief body by any stretch. it simply takes extra tire to tame the high-frequency vibes via the body. It could actually’t be a damping problem, no steel is an efficient damper.. it is obtained to be a resonance downside.
I actually just like the bonded Treks. It is a disgrace that the know-how obtained such a nasty rap again within the early 90’s, it might have been developed into some very nice bikes, I believe.
–Shannon
[ad_2]